The best way to structure your introduction is to follow the three-move approach shown in Table 3. The reader passes through a test of boredom while reading paragraphs of the Discussion section apart from the introductory, and the last paragraphs.
When editing a manuscript, the section that is typically the most problematic is the discussion. With this in mind, be careful that you do not read more into the findings than can be supported by the evidence you have gathered.
Table 3 clearly shows that … 7b. University of Michigan Press; You then guide us through a series of intricate images and graphs that capture all the relevant data you collected during your research.
Describe the procedures for your study in sufficient detail that other scientists could repeat your work to verify your findings. Syringes of identical appearence containing either agent were prepared by the satellite pharmacist, who alone was aware of group assignment.
Revise your paper at the macrostructure and the microstructure level using different strategies and techniques. List research questions or hypotheses; c.
In fact editors of the journal will not reserve the limited space in their journal for articles yielding similar conclusions. Do we have to get a pre-peer review about the written manuscript. Is ondansetron as effective as droperidol in prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.
Each paragraph should contain opinions in favour or against the topic discussed, critical evaluations, and learning points. Do not change the point of view within one paragraph. Open in a separate window Adapted from Swales and Feak and Hess [ 1112 ].
This should be a general statement reiterating your answer to the research question and adding its scientific implications, practical application, or advice. Miller PharmD, Michael P. Allyn and Bacon, The purpose of this study was to determine if there was a difference between ondansetron and droperidol in preventing PONV.
Announce principle findings; d. Avoiding the "school paper style" rejection. Be clear, concise, and objective in describing your Results. Indeed, for most journals, this is a very brief section of about to words, but it might be the most difficult section due to its importance.
During writing process of the manuscript one of these can be selected based on the intensity of the discussion. University College Writing Centre.
The moves and information from your outline can help to create your Introduction efficiently and without missing steps. Doing so might raise questions about your initial research design and protocols.
Oxford University Press; In the end, the purpose of this section is to allow other researchers to evaluate and repeat your work. When writing the discussion section, you should carefully consider all possible explanations for the study results, rather than just those that fit your hypothesis or prior assumptions and biases.
If they do not, explain why not, or you may leave it unresolved "We cannot account for the difference seen in If appropriate, the discussion section is also where you state how the findings from your study revealed new gaps in the literature that had not been previously exposed or adequately described, and Engage the reader in thinking critically about issues based upon an evidence-based interpretation of findings; it is not governed strictly by objective reporting of information.
If you choose to combine the results section and the discussion section into a single narrative, you must be clear in how you report the information discovered and your own interpretation of each finding.
Were there any problems with carrying out the method as originally planned. The groups did not differ significantly in age, weight, height, ASA status, or doses of intraoperative drugs. Data is expressed as number within the sample who possess the characteristic.
Citation quality is important because it is used to support the results presented in the manuscript. Accordingly, the findings of the study are determined in order of their importance, and a paragraph is constructed for each finding Figure 1.
Seedlings or mature plants. Look forward Implications for patient care, or for theory Suggestions for future research "If I had to do it over I would After these short sections, your eyes get used to your writing and your efficiency in spotting problems decreases.
Despite your attempts to present your ideas in a logical and comprehensive way, first drafts are frequently a mess. Discussion is one of the hardest section in research paper or thesis. It needs experience, learning and practice. It is not a way to restate your results. For additional information about how to write a strong research paper, make sure to check out our full research writing series!
If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to post in the comment box below, email us at [email protected] or reach out to us through our Contact Us page.
Keep the following sequential points in mind as you organize and write the discussion section of your paper: Think of your discussion as an inverted pyramid. Organize the discussion from the general to the specific, linking your findings to the literature, then to theory, then to practice [if appropriate].
Jul 25, · To write a discussion essay, start by taking a side on the issue you're writing about, like "Immigration is good for the country." Then, outline the main points that made you decide to take that position and do research to find evidence that backs them up%(26).
Discussion is one of the hardest section in research paper or thesis. It needs experience, learning and practice. It is not a way to restate your results. Recommendations for further research can be included in either the discussion or conclusion of your paper, but do not repeat your recommendations in the both sections.
Think about the overall narrative flow of your paper to .How to write a discussion on research paper